GMAT考試寫作輔導(dǎo):GMAT作文滿分速成法
寫作輔導(dǎo)：GMAT作文滿分速成法 大家都知道，我們中國(guó)人其實(shí)在英語(yǔ)的聽(tīng)說(shuō)讀寫四個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)上最薄弱的就是輸出的兩個(gè)能力：說(shuō)和寫；而最強(qiáng)的就是輸入的兩個(gè)能力：讀和聽(tīng)。而如果我們想在出國(guó)的道路上成為佼佼者，那么在保持傳統(tǒng)強(qiáng)項(xiàng)的同時(shí)是否應(yīng)該特別加強(qiáng)一下我們的口語(yǔ)和寫作能力呢？
而根據(jù)我考TSE（TEST OF SPOKEN ENGLISH）的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，其實(shí)口語(yǔ)考試分?jǐn)?shù)的高低（注意這里僅僅是指考試分?jǐn)?shù)）幾乎完全取決于你到底背了多少段落。因?yàn)榭谡Z(yǔ)的TOPIC是覆蓋面非常廣泛的：教育、文化、歷史、生物、科技、藝術(shù)等等，所以這就從客觀上決定了考生必須背大量的段落，而實(shí)際上背的過(guò)程中也就是把不涉及過(guò)于具體內(nèi)容的話背下來(lái)，到考試的時(shí)候再把聽(tīng)到或看到題目要求的具體內(nèi)容往里面加。一定要注意是從背具體的段落到提煉抽象的魔板最后再回到具體的段落：
易優(yōu)作文批改系統(tǒng)，易優(yōu)作文打分、易優(yōu)作文評(píng)分評(píng)價(jià) <a href=http://www.zequeka.cn/jiaoshoulanmu/>易優(yōu)作文批改</A>
·具體
·抽象
·具體
下面，將再用GMAT的作文填空法來(lái)幫大家強(qiáng)化“魔板”的方法 以及填空的概念。
GMAT中作文也分為兩個(gè)部分：“一休”和“阿狗”。那么這兩個(gè)部分也是同等重要，而且一個(gè)難以短期突破，一個(gè)只能短期突破，所以“魔板”的作用就在這里顯示出來(lái)了?！鞍⒐贰庇捎谑邱g論文，不需要發(fā)表考生自己的觀點(diǎn)，只需要考生指出段落的邏輯錯(cuò)誤即可，那么專門用來(lái)寫駁論文的反駁式段落就顯得非常重要，而我們大家都沒(méi)有學(xué)過(guò)如何去寫駁論文，所以可以說(shuō)不背“魔板”基本就不可能及格。而背“魔板”也分高手和水手，所以有以下三重境界：
·知道如何提煉“魔板”
·知道需要將提煉的“魔板”排列組合成自己的考試“魔板”
·知道怎么往“魔板”里正確、恰當(dāng)?shù)靥羁?
在線批改作文，<a href=http://www.zequeka.cn/jiaoshoulanmu/>易優(yōu)名師作文批改</a>
只有達(dá)到這三重境界的全部才可能獲得滿分。下面將以幾個(gè)例子來(lái)鞏固“魔板”的提煉方法以及重點(diǎn)介紹如何填空，而排列組合由于非常簡(jiǎn)單而且因人而異，這里就不再介紹。
1. 開(kāi)頭段
In this argument， the arguer concludes that sending the mechanics of GAA to a two-week QCS on proper maintenance procedures will automatically lead to improved maintenance and to greater customer satisfaction along with greater profits for the airline. To support the conclusion， the arguer points out that the performance of the maintenance crews in the automobile racing industry improved markedly after their crews had attended the seminar. In addition， the arguer reasons that since the maintenance crews of the automobile racing industry and the mechanics of GAA perform many of the same functions， the airlines will gain similar benefits from the training program. This argument suffers from several critical fallacies.
作文網(wǎng)推薦，<A http://www.zequeka.cn>易優(yōu)作文網(wǎng)</a>，中小學(xué)生學(xué)語(yǔ)文閱讀寫作的好幫手
In this argument， the arguer recommends that C should advise its citizens to install both air conditioners and fans for cooling in order to reduce the cost of electricity. To justify this claim， the arguer provides the evidence that many citizens of C suffer from the rising costs of electricity. In addition， he cites the result of a recent study that using fans alone costs more than using air conditioners alone， and that using both fans and air conditioners costs less than either using fans or air conditioners alone. A careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless the conclusion is.
In this analysis， the arguer claims that P University should offer employment to the spouse of each new faculty member that they hire. To substantiate the conclusion， the arguer cites the example of B College where professors prefer to have their spouse employed in the same geographical area. In addition， the arguer assumes that this offer of possible job for their spouse on the campus， no matter whether it will be accepted， is the only factor that new professors consider in deciding whether to accept a university position. This argument is unconvincing for several critical flaws.
提升作文素養(yǎng)，尋找作文素材，就來(lái)<A http://www.zequeka.cn/yuwensuyang/>易優(yōu)作文素養(yǎng)</a>。
In this argument， the arguer advocates that the C Corporation should hire DF， a family owned local company that offers varied menu of fish and poultry， instead of GT Company， the present supplier of food in C”s employee cafeteria. The recommendation is based on the observation that the GT is expensive， that its prices have kept rising， that it does not serve special diets， and that three employees complained about it. Meanwhile， the arguer assumes D to be a better choice for C because a sample lunch of this company that the arguer happened to taste was delicious. This argument is problematic for two reasons.
The conclusion in this argument is that F College can expect to increase enrollment by promising to find jobs for students after graduation. In support of this prediction， the arguer claims that college-bound students are increasingly concerned about job prospects after graduation. Moreover， the arguer assumes that this attempt has three benefits： （1） to enable F to compete with more famous schools; （2） to encourage students to start career preparation early; （3） to encourage students to complete their coursework. This argument is fraught with vague， oversimplified and unwarranted assumptions.
