Some people said giving aid to poorer countries has more objective effects than positive effects, to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Afflicted with famine, wars, diseases, people living in those poverty-stricken countries are struggling for survival. From Vietnam to Burma, from Ethiopia to Cambodia, what they worry about is where is the next meal, how to save the long-suffering family”s life and what next day will be. In face of this severe situation, it is suggested that rich countries should shoulder responsibility to help them out of such harsh situation.
The opponents are of the opinion that this well-meant aid may engender unfavorable effects on the current situation. To begin with, those aids are likely to be misused by local officials. Surprising is that the poorer a country is, the higher possibility of its government”s corruption, which is, actually, the root cause for its backwardness. To make it worse, citizens, once granted food and daily necessities alike, are prone to produce strong independence and reliance. It is universally acknowledged that only those countries thriving for advance on their own can really make a difference. Once the counting-on habit, which serves as a barrier to further development, is formed, to eliminate it will be a tough job. 蘇州易優(yōu)吳老師初中語文高效提分（Tel:181-1815-9898）
However, proponents also have strong reasons. Primarily, the supports, financially and technologically, have turned out to be of high importance to boosting economy of poor nations. For example, powerful economies, like France, Britain, America to name just a few, can invest in domestic industries, so that more job opportunities are brought and living standard enhanced. Furthermore, it is a win-win strategy to reach out an aiding hand. Without doubt, modern technology enables the world shrink into a Village, therefore, with a few villagers suffering, an overall prosperity is nothing but a Utopia. That is to say only when hunger is conquered, when wars are quenched globally can the real comprehensive prosperity be achieved. Most important of all, those super powers, historically, were major contributors to the current trauma of those have-nots.
Overall, rich countries are definitely duty-bound to help their poor counterparts out. For one thing, it mirrors the humanism; for another, it is an indispensable procedure in realization of global peace and flourish. 蘇州小學(xué)語文提優(yōu)培訓(xùn)，就找易優(yōu)吳老師，20余年輔導(dǎo)經(jīng)驗，數(shù)百成功案例。（TEL:181-1815-9898）
重點單詞 查看全部解釋
disagree [.disə'gri:] 想一想再看
v. 不一致，有分歧，不適應(yīng)，不適宜
聯(lián)想記憶 X 單詞disagree 聯(lián)想記憶：
dis不+agree同意→不一致，爭執(zhí)
prosperity [prɔs'periti] 想一想再看
n. 繁榮，興旺
聯(lián)想記憶 X 單詞prosperity 聯(lián)想記憶：
源于：prosper（v 成功；興?。?
severe [si'viə] 想一想再看
adj. 劇烈的，嚴重的，嚴峻的，嚴厲的，嚴格的
聯(lián)想記憶 X 單詞severe 聯(lián)想記憶：
severe的人總是sever
trauma ['trɔ:mə] 想一想再看
n. 精神創(chuàng)傷，外傷
聯(lián)想記憶 X 單詞trauma 聯(lián)想記憶：
讀：臭罵，造成精神創(chuàng)傷
corruption [kə'rʌpʃən] 想一想再看
n. 腐敗，墮落，貪污
蘇州小學(xué)語文提優(yōu)培訓(xùn)，就找易優(yōu)吳老師，20余年輔導(dǎo)經(jīng)驗，數(shù)百成功案例。（TEL:181-1815-9898）
聯(lián)想記憶 X 單詞corruption 聯(lián)想記憶：
cor全部+rupt斷裂+ion→腐敗
strategy ['strætidʒi] 想一想再看
n. 戰(zhàn)略，策略
prone [prəun] 想一想再看
adj. 俯臥的，易于 ... 的，有 ... 傾向的
聯(lián)想記憶 X 單詞prone 聯(lián)想記憶：
pro前，ne：向前頃的
procedure [prə'si:dʒə] 想一想再看
n. 程序，手續(xù)，步驟; 常規(guī)的做法
聯(lián)想記憶 X 單詞procedure 聯(lián)想記憶：
pro在前＋ced行走，前進+ure→在前面走完的程序→程序；手續(xù)
current ['kʌrənt] 想一想再看
n. (水、氣、電)流，趨勢
adj. 流通的
聯(lián)想記憶 X 單詞current 聯(lián)想記憶：
currr跑，發(fā)生+cnt→跑的→流動的;潮流
domestic [də'mestik] 想一想再看
蘇州易優(yōu)吳老師初中語文高效提分（Tel:181-1815-9898）
adj. 國內(nèi)的，家庭的，馴養(yǎng)的
n. 家仆
